Garson’s status as a prosecution witness in multiple cases garnered significant attention. As time went on, however, defence counsels began to point out the discrepancies, inconsistencies and peculiarities in Garson’s testimonies. First, Mesut Can Tarım, a lawyer acting for several defendants who were charged as a result of Garson’s testimony, published a report entitled “Anonymous Witness Garson -Controversies in Statements” in which he pointed out the problems with the testimonies of the “anonymous witness”, later a jurist, Dr Gokhan Gunes identified many other similar discrepancies. Continue
